David Broomfield - Page 11

                                        - 11 -                                        
          The exceptions have generally arisen where the knowledge that the           
          Commissioner possesses regarding the taxpayer’s incarceration is            
          quite specific and there is an infirmity in the last known                  
          address on which the Commissioner seeks to rely.  See DiViaio v.            
          Commissioner, 539 F.2d 231 (D.C. Cir. 1976)(notice not sent to              
          last known address where Commissioner aware that taxpayer had               
          been incarcerated in Atlanta penitentiary for 2 years and mailed            
          notice to warden there for service on taxpayer); Keeton v.                  
          Commissioner, 74 T.C. 377 (1980)(Commissioner participated in               
          prosecution resulting in taxpayers' conviction for Federal tax              
          crimes, therefore taxpayers' whereabouts in Federal prison system           
          readily available to Commissioner; address on which Commissioner            
          relied not given on returns for years involved); O’Brien v.                 
          Commissioner, 62 T.C. 543 (1974)(deficiency determined as a                 
          result of Commissioner’s agent’s interview of taxpayer in jail;             
          neither address on which Commissioner relied had been provided by           
          taxpayer).                                                                  
               For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Wanda            
          Avenue address was petitioner’s last known address when                     
          respondent mailed the notice of determination.  The Wanda Avenue            
          address was the address reported by petitioner in the last return           
          he filed before respondent’s mailing of the notice of                       
          determination; namely, his 1996 Federal income tax return,                  
          received by respondent on August 21, 1997.  Moreover, petitioner            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011