Raleigh Cox and Brenda J. Cox - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          from their accountant’s lack of professional care.  Reinhardt v.            
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-397 (no negligence when an                    
          “incorrect return is the result of the preparer’s mistakes”).  We           
          also take into account the Coxes’ educational and business                  
          experience.  See Pratt v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-279.  The           
          trial showed that Cox, though gifted in his field, knew little of           
          accounting.  Such men should especially be able to rely on a                
          preparer if they give him their business records, holding no                
          information back, as we specifically find that he did.  Given               
          Cox’s genuine lack of knowledge of accounting, we do not construe           
          his actions as constituting negligence or disregard of tax law.             
          See Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947-48 (1985).                      
               To reflect the settlement of the other issues in this case,            


                                             Decision will be entered under           
                                        Rule 155.                                     



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011