Garber Industries Holding Co., Inc. - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          That issue turns on the interpretation of section                           
          382(l)(3)(A)(i), a matter of first impression for this Court.               
               Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to              
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 1998, and all Rule                  
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
          For the sake of convenience, all percentages are rounded to the             
          nearest full percent.                                                       
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               The parties submitted this case fully stipulated pursuant to           
          Rule 122.  The stipulation of facts, stipulation of settled                 
          issues, and accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by this           
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioner’s                
          mailing address was in Lafayette, Louisiana.                                
               At the time of petitioner’s incorporation in December 1982,            
          Charles M. Garber, Sr. (Charles), and his brother, Kenneth R.               
          Garber, Sr. (Kenneth) (collectively, sometimes, the Garber                  
          brothers), owned 68 percent and 26 percent, respectively, of                
          petitioner’s common stock.  The spouses, children, and other                
          siblings of the Garber brothers owned the remaining shares of               



               1(...continued)                                                        
          limitation applies to petitioner’s 1998 net operating loss (NOL)            
          deduction, there is a deficiency in petitioner’s income tax for             
          that year in the amount of $311,188, and (2) if the sec. 382                
          limitation does not apply to petitioner’s 1998 NOL deduction,               
          there is a deficiency in petitioner’s income tax for that year in           
          the amount of $5,070.                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011