James M. and Mary N. Gorski - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,500 in petitioners’           
          2001 Federal income tax that was based solely on the failure to             
          pay the 10-percent additional tax on an early distribution of               
          $25,000 from an individual retirement account (IRA).  After                 
          respondent’s concession that $7,017.01 of the distribution was              
          used to pay qualified higher education expenses in the taxable              
          year 2001, the issue is whether petitioners are subject to the              
          10-percent additional tax under section 72(t)(1) on the remaining           
          $17,982.99.  Petitioners resided in Liberty Township, Ohio, at              
          the time the petition was filed.                                            
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioners received an early distribution of $25,000 from             
          an IRA in 2001.2  Petitioners were both younger than 59-1/2 at              
          the time of the withdrawal.  Petitioners reported the $25,000 as            
          income on line 15b of their jointly filed 2001 Form 1040, U.S.              
          Individual Income Tax Return, which was filed on August 14,                 
          2002.3  Petitioners’ daughter Kathleen enrolled in classes at               
          Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, in August, 2001.                          
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,500 for the taxable           
          year 2001 based solely on petitioners’ failure to pay the 10-               


               2    The record does not contain the exact date in 2001 of             
          the distribution.                                                           
               3    This appears to be a timely filed return, though the              
          record does not specifically contain information regarding                  
          extension requests.                                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011