Alan D. Lenzen and Dianne Lenzen - Page 18

                                        - 18 -                                        
          Lenzens are liable for income tax on additional gambling income             
          of $13,619 for 1999.                                                        
          IV. Penalties                                                               
               Section 6662 imposes an accuracy-related penalty on the                
          portion of an underpayment attributable to negligence or                    
          disregard of the rules or regulations.  Sec. 6662(b)(1).  The               
          term “negligence” includes any failure to make a reasonable                 
          attempt to comply with the provisions of the internal revenue               
          laws or to exercise ordinary and reasonable care in the                     
          preparation of a tax return.  Sec. 6662(c); Gowni v.                        
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-154.  Failure to maintain adequate            
          books and records or to substantiate items properly also                    
          constitutes negligence.  Sec. 1.6662-3(b), Income Tax Regs.  The            
          term “disregard” includes any careless, reckless, or intentional            
          disregard.  Id.  An accuracy-related penalty will not be imposed            
          with respect to any portion of an underpayment as to which the              
          taxpayer acted with reasonable cause and in good faith.  Sec.               
          6664(c).                                                                    
               We determined above that petitioners did not maintain the              
          substantiation required by sections 162, 274, and 6001 for the              
          sales expense deduction.  In addition, Mr. Lenzen admitted that             
          he did not retain adequate records of his gambling winnings and             
          losses.  Petitioners have not shown that they had reasonable                
          cause or acted in good faith in deducting the Lenzens’ personal             
          expenses as business expenses of RAF and in underreporting the              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011