William B. and Diane S. Meyer - Page 10

                                        -10-                                          
         (2000) (citing Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1417 (5th               
         Cir. 1984)).  Consequently, although respondent improperly                   
         denied petitioners’ request to record the section 6330 hearing,              
         see sec. 7521(a)(1), we conclude that (1) it is unnecessary and              
         would not be productive to remand the instant case to the Appeals            
         Office for another section 6330 hearing in order to allow                    
         petitioners to make an audio recording and (2) it is unnecessary             
         and inappropriate under the circumstances of the instant case to             
         reject respondent’s determination, see Keene v. Commissioner, 121            
         T.C. 8, 19-20 (2003); Lunsford v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 183, 189            
         (2001); Kemper v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2003-195.                          
              Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes this Court to require a                   
         taxpayer to pay a penalty not in excess of $25,000 whenever the              
         taxpayer’s position is frivolous or groundless or the taxpayer               
         has instituted or pursued the proceeding primarily for delay.                
              SEC. 6673.  SANCTIONS AND COSTS AWARDED BY COURTS.                      
                    (a) Tax Court Proceedings.--                                      
                        (1) Procedures instituted primarily for                       
              delay, etc.--Whenever it appears to the Tax Court                       
              that–-                                                                  
                             (A) proceedings before it have been                      
                        instituted or maintained by the taxpayer                      
                        primarily for delay,                                          


              8(...continued)                                                         
          Hiland, we held that the contentions raised by the taxpayer were            
          frivolous and/or groundless, and we imposed a penalty pursuant to           
          sec. 6673.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011