- 8 - demeanor at trial, we find his testimony on this point not to be credible. See Orum v. Commissioner, supra at 9. Accordingly, we find that on September 2, 2003, respondent mailed petitioner the hearing notice for 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 to petitioner’s last known address, that petitioner received it in due course, and that petitioner failed to file a timely request for an Appeals Office hearing pursuant to section 6330(a)(2) and (3)(B) and (b). A decision letter is not a determination letter pursuant to section 6320 or 6330. See Orum v. Commissioner, supra at 7-12; Kennedy v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 255, 263 (2001); Offiler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 492, 495 (2000). Respondent did not issue a determination letter to petitioner sufficient to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction to review the hearing notice for 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. Orum v. Commissioner, supra; Kennedy v. Commissioner, supra. Accordingly, we shall dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that respondent did not make a determination pursuant to section 6330 regarding the hearing notice for 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 because petitioner failed to file a timely request for an Appeals Office hearing pursuant to section 6330(a)(2) and (3)(B) and (b). Orum v. Commissioner, supra; Kennedy v. Commissioner, supra.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011