Michael and Marla Sklar - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          portion of the tuition payments they made in 1991 to their                  
          children’s schools.  Respondent apparently believed that                    
          petitioners were Scientologists, because in February 1994                   
          respondent wrote to petitioners to request verification of their            
          payments to the Church of Scientology.  By letter to respondent             
          in May 1994, petitioner stated that the deductions were based on            
          tuition he had paid for religious education for his children.               
               In August 1994, respondent sent a letter to petitioners,               
          again erroneously stating that petitioners’ payments were to the            
          Church of Scientology.  Petitioner telephoned the author of that            
          letter to say that he was not a Scientologist.  By letter dated             
          November 7, 1994, respondent told petitioners that respondent               
          allowed in full their claim for a refund for 1991.                          
               2.   1992-94                                                           
               Petitioners filed an amended 1992 return and a 1993 return             
          in which they deducted part of their children’s tuition as a                
          charitable contribution.  Petitioners received a refund based on            
          the amended 1993 return, and respondent did not disallow the                
          deduction claimed on their 1993 return.                                     
               Petitioners deducted 55 percent of their payments to Emek              
          and Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn as a charitable contribution deduction             
          for 1994.   Petitioners described the deduction on a Form 8275,             
          Disclosure Statement, attached to their 1994 return.  Respondent            
          examined petitioners’ 1994 tax return and disallowed the                    






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011