William C. Stearman III - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          Background                                                                  
               By notice dated June 30, 2004 the Court set this case for              
          trial at the Court’s Dallas, Texas, session beginning December 6,           
          2004.  This notice specifically stated:  “YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR            
          MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND ENTRY OF DECISION AGAINST           
          YOU.”  Attached to this notice was the Court’s standing pretrial            
          order.                                                                      
               On November 2, 2004, in docket No. 20928-03, respondent                
          filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which           
          relief could be granted and to impose a penalty under section               
          6673(a).  Petitioner failed to appear at the call of these                  
          consolidated cases.2  At the call of petitioner’s cases, in                 
          docket No. 15561-04, respondent orally moved the Court to dismiss           
          for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted             
          and to impose a penalty under section 6673(a).                              
          Discussion                                                                  
               Rule 34(b)(4) requires that a petition filed in this Court             
          shall contain clear and concise assignments of each and every               
          error that the taxpayer alleges to have been committed by the               
          Commissioner in the determination of the deficiency and the                 
          additions to tax or penalties in dispute.  Rule 34(b)(5) further            


               1(...continued)                                                        
          Procedure.                                                                  
               2  On Nov. 22, 2004, the Court granted respondent’s motion             
          to consolidate.                                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011