GillisTriplett - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          business address at the time of incorporation was the same as               
          petitioner’s personal home address.  Petitioner opened a                    
          corporate bank account on behalf of the Center with Nationsbank             
          and listed himself as the sole authorized signatory.2  Petitioner           
          also installed an additional phone line in his home in the name             
          of “Gillis Triplett d/b/a/ Embassy Christian Center, Inc.”                  
               Petitioner filed his 1998, 1999, and 2000 Federal income tax           
          returns untimely on April 1, 2002.  He filed his 2001 Federal               
          income tax return timely.  During the years in question,                    
          petitioner reported total income and claimed deductions for                 
          charitable contributions in the following amounts:3                         
               Year         Total Income         Charitable Contributions             
               1998      $41,635                  $18,831                             
               1999      33,097                   16,549                              
               2000           32,968         16,484                                   
               2001           40,593         20,297                                   

               Respondent disallowed all the claimed charitable                       
          contributions deductions due to lack of substantiation.                     


               2Petitioner testified that the Center had a treasurer for              
          some of the time during the years at issue who was authorized to            
          issue checks from the account, but he offered no evidence in                
          support of this testimony.  Regardless, petitioner was authorized           
          to write checks on behalf of the Center at all times during the             
          years at issue.                                                             
               3The amounts listed on the notice of deficiency sent to                
          petitioner differ slightly from those referred to during trial              
          and in this opinion.  The true amounts, listed herein, are taken            
          from petitioner’s 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 Federal income tax             
          returns.  The difference in the amounts, however, is so nominal             
          that a Rule 155 computation is unnecessary.                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011