Thiele L. Wetzel - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               Petitioner took frivolous positions at trial, including that           
          (1) he was not a taxpayer as defined by the Internal Revenue                
          Code; (2) income from his tax return preparation business was not           
          taxable; (3) payment of Federal income tax is voluntary; (4) he             
          can only be taxed based on substitutes for returns that qualify             
          under section 6020(b) and that are on forms approved by OMB and             
          signed by the Secretary; and (5) no proper assessment was made              
          because respondent did not provide Form 23C.  Respondent’s                  
          settlement officer warned petitioner that he might be held liable           
          for a penalty under section 6673.  Petitioner continued to make             
          frivolous arguments in his petition, during pretrial proceedings,           
          at trial, and in his brief.                                                 
               A taxpayer may be liable for a penalty under section 6673 if           
          the taxpayer knew or should have known that his or her claim or             
          argument was frivolous.  Hansen v. Commissioner, 820 F.2d 1464,             
          1470 (9th Cir. 1987); Nis Family Trust v. Commissioner, 115 T.C.            
          523, 544 (2000); Corcoran v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-18,              
          affd. 54 Fed. Appx. 254 (9th Cir. 2002).  Petitioner is a                   
          professional tax return preparer who knew or should have known              
          that his arguments are frivolous.  We conclude that petitioner              
          instituted and maintained these proceedings primarily for delay.            











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011