Michael A. Zapara and Gina A. Zapara - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
         of * * * [section 6335(f)] gives the owner a remedy if the IRS               
         has seized the property, a long time has passed, yet the IRS has             
         not given notice of when the sale will be held.”  Id.  In this               
         sense, section 6335(f) effectively “regulates the time period                
         between seizure and sale”.  Id.  Because section 6335(f) provides            
         an adequate remedy for any delays in selling property and in the             
         absence of a definite statutory time period for providing notice             
         of public sale, we decline to impose on respondent a general duty            
         to timely sell seized property pursuant to section 6335(b).9  Cf.            
         Cash v. United States, 961 F.2d 562, 567 (5th Cir. 1992)                     
         (rejecting taxpayers’ contention that section 6335(b) requires               
         the Commissioner to sell all property it seizes:  “We read that              
         section as merely setting forth the procedures the Service must              
         follow when it does sell such property.”).                                   
              D.  Request To Sell Seized Property Pursuant to Section                 
              6335(f)                                                                 
              Under section 6335(f), the owner of any property seized by              
         levy may request the Commissioner to sell the seized property                
         within 60 days after the request (or within any longer period                


               9 We note that sec. 6336 authorizes the Commissioner to sell           
          any seized property that is liable to perish or become greatly              
          reduced in price or value by keeping.  Except in hindsight,                 
          petitioners do not allege facts that might have authorized an               
          immediate sale of their stock under sec. 6336.  See Galusha v.              
          Commissioner, 95 T.C. 218 (1990); Williams v. Commissioner, 92              
          T.C. 920 (1989).  We do not decide whether the Commissioner has a           
          general duty to sell property of the type described in that                 
          section.                                                                    




Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011