Brenda J. Clarrk - Page 14

                                       - 13 -                                         
          used in determining whether it is inequitable to hold a                     
          requesting spouse liable for all or part of the liability for any           
          unpaid tax or deficiency.4  The requesting spouse must satisfy              
          seven conditions (threshold conditions) before the Commissioner             
          will consider a request for relief under section 6015(f).  Rev.             
          Proc. 2003-61, supra.  Respondent agrees that petitioner has                
          satisfied those threshold conditions.                                       
               Where, as here, the requesting spouse satisfies the                    
          threshold conditions, Rev. proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03,5 lists                 
          factors to be considered in determining whether to grant                    
          equitable relief.  Therefore, the Court considers the factors in            
          Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03(2)(a) and (b) in determining                  
          whether respondent abused his discretion in denying equitable               
          relief under section 6015(f).                                               
               In this case, petitioner satisfies only one of the factors             
          listed in the revenue procedure.  Petitioner divorced Mr. Clark             
          in 2003; therefore, she satisfies the first factor.  With respect           


               4Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447, was superseded by Rev.           
          Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, and is effective as to requests             
          for relief filed on or after Nov. 1, 2003, and also is effective            
          for requests for relief pending on Nov. 1, 2003, as to which no             
          preliminary determination letter had been issued as of that date.           
          Petitioner’s application for relief was filed on Feb. 18, 2003,             
          and the report of the Appeals officer is dated Feb. 15, 2005.               
          Therefore, petitioner’s claim for relief was pending on Nov. 1,             
          2003.                                                                       
               5The Court need not consider Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.02,            
          2003-2 C.B. at 298, since that section relates to                           
          “underpayments”.                                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011