Charles Horton Devers - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
               The original dissolution proceeding, Cause No. 01FC-7461,              
          was dismissed in July 2002 for reasons not relevant to the                  
          instant action.  Petitioner himself then sought a dissolution of            
          the marriage in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri             
          (Family Court Cause No. 02FC-7407, filed July 31, 2002) and an              
          Order dissolving the Deverses' marriage was entered on October              
          13, 2004.                                                                   
               Petitioner claimed a deduction of $29,000 as alimony on his            
          2002 tax return.2  A notice of deficiency was mailed to                     
          petitioner determining an income tax deficiency of $9,350.  After           
          further inquiry by respondent, it became clear that the $29,000             
          comprised $24,000 of maintenance paid to Ms. Devers and the                 
          $5,000 paid to Mr. Dubin.  Before trial, respondent conceded the            
          deduction for the payments to Ms. Devers and recalculated                   
          petitioner’s income tax deficiency to be $1,607.  Only the $1,607           
          deficiency corresponding to the $5,000 payment made to Mr. Dubin            
          remains at issue.                                                           
                                     Discussion3                                      
               Section 71(a) provides the general rule that alimony                   
          payments are included in the gross income of the payee spouse;              
          section 215(a) provides the complementary general rule that                 


               2  There is no disagreement that if the deduction were                 
          proper, 2002 would be the appropriate tax year.                             
               3  The issue for decision is essentially legal in nature;              
          accordingly, we decide it without regard to the burden of proof.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011