Mark D.George - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          money is to be the “fair market value of the property at the time           
          of the contribution”.  Sec. 1.170A-1(c)(1), Income Tax Regs.                
          Generally, a taxpayer must maintain certain records in order to             
          claim a deduction for a charitable contribution.  The taxpayer              
          must have a receipt (or letter) from the donee showing the name             
          of the donee, the date and location of the contribution, and a              
          description of the property.  Sec. 1.170A-13(b)(1) and (2),                 
          Income Tax Regs.  Additionally, the regulations require that a              
          taxpayer taking a deduction in excess of $500 must maintain                 
          records that show the fair market value of the property at the              
          time of the contribution and the method utilized in determining             
          the fair market value; the manner and date of acquisition of the            
          property; and the cost or other basis of the property, adjusted             
          as provided by section 1016.  See sec. 1.170A-13(b)(2)(ii) and              
          (3)(i), Income Tax Regs.                                                    
               The only information in evidence is the letter from NKF                
          confirming receipt of the truck with a description.  There is no            
          reliable evidence of the fair market value of the truck at the              
          time that it was contributed.  The printout from CarPrices.com              
          gives no indication as to how adjustments are made or how, sight            
          unseen, the fair market value of the vehicle is determined.                 
          There is no evidence that CarPrices.com is a reliable source of             
          market information.  Additionally, there is no evidence proving             
          petitioner’s original cost or other basis in the truck.                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011