Theodus J. Jordan - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          petitioner’s overpayment for 2001.10  The disallowance of the               
          credit that petitioner claimed with respect to this item does not           
          affect the amount of petitioner’s deficiency for 2002.  See sec.            
          6211(a) (defining a deficiency generally as the amount by which             
          the correct tax exceeds the tax shown on the taxpayer’s return,             
          increased by prior assessments and reduced by rebates as defined            
          in sec. 6211(b)(2)); cf. Terry v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 85 (1988)           
          (holding that an intercepted refund does not constitute a rebate            
          for purposes of determining a deficiency).                                  
               We have considered all of petitioner’s remaining contentions           
          and find them to be without merit.  To reflect the foregoing and            
          the parties’ concessions,                                                   

                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        under Rule 155.                               














               10 As of April 26, 2002, it could not have been determined             
          whether petitioner had any overpayment with respect to taxable              
          year 2002.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  

Last modified: May 25, 2011