Clenzo and Louella Knox - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               The sole issue for decision is whether a lump-sum payment to           
          Clenzo Knox (petitioner) during 2000 in the amount of $9,525 from           
          an “eligible State deferred compensation plan” under section 457            
          constitutes gross income.2                                                  
               Some of the facts were stipulated and are so found.  The               
          stipulation and annexed exhibits are so found and are                       
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petition was             
          filed, petitioners were legal residents of Harvey, Louisiana.               
               For 29 years, petitioner was employed as a transit                     
          supervisor for Regional Transit Authority, a bus line in New                
          Orleans, Louisiana.  Petitioner’s employer was an agency of the             
          State of Louisiana, and his employer maintained a deferred                  
          compensation plan that was qualified under section 457.  Sometime           
          between 1988 and 1990, petitioner commenced making contributions            
          to the plan.  His contributions were deducted from his wages.               
          Petitioner’s contributions, as well as those of the other plan              
          participants, were remitted to a plan administrator, PEBSCO.                
               Petitioner retired from his employment during 2000.  For               
          reasons not addressed at trial, petitioner did not elect to                 
          receive retirement benefits under the section 457 plan.  Instead,           


               2On line 16a of their Federal income tax return for 2000,              
          petitioners reported total pensions and annuities income of                 
          $4,772.  The parties did not describe the nature of this pension            
          income at trial.  The Court assumes that it is unrelated to the             
          $9,525 at issue.                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011