Pamela L. Light - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,599 in petitioner’s           
          2002 Federal income tax.  The sole issue for this Court to decide           
          is whether petitioner must include in her gross income alimony              
          payments she received in 2002.                                              
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.  At           
          the time the petition in this case was filed, petitioner resided            
          in Bethel, Pennsylvania.                                                    
               Petitioner and Kent R. Gutzler (Mr. Gutzler) were married on           
          September 12, 1998.  There were no children born of the marriage.           
          After petitioner and Mr. Gutzler separated, a final order (order)           
          was issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County,                    
          Pennsylvania, Domestic Relations Section on January 22, 2002,               
          which directed that Mr. Gutzler pay $1,400 monthly for                      
          petitioner’s support, effective January 1, 2002.  These monthly             
          payments were to end in the event of either party’s death.  The             
          order included a handwritten notation that read:  “Plaintiff                
          agrees to be responsible for the monthly payment of the Jeep                
          vehicle in her possession and the insurance thereon.”                       
               The parties entered into a postnuptial agreement (agreement)           
          on October 11, 2002.  Under the agreement, Mr. Gutzler was                  
          ordered to pay petitioner alimony of $1,400 a month.  These                 
          monthly payments were to end in the event of either party’s                 
          death.  The agreement also provided for the tax treatment of the            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011