Sean Michael Bears and Greta Bears - Page 6




                                        - 5 -                                         
              Section 152(e)(1)1 provides a general rule that limits the              
         dependency exemption deduction as follows:  If the child received            
         over half of his support during the calendar year from his                   
         parents who lived apart at all times during the last 6 months of             
         the calendar year and is in the custody of one or both parents               
         for more than one-half of the calendar year, then the child is               
         treated as receiving over half of his support during the calendar            
         year from the parent having custody for a greater portion of the             
         calendar year (the custodial parent).2                                       
              But section 152(e)(2) provides an exception to the general              
         rule of section 152(e)(1):  “If * * * the custodial parent signs             
         a written declaration (in such manner and form as the Secretary              
         may by regulations prescribe)” that he will not claim the child              
         as a dependent and the noncustodial parent attaches the written              
         declaration to his return for the taxable year, then the                     
         noncustodial parent is entitled to the dependency exemption                  

               1Sec. 152(e)(1) applies to both married parents and parents            
          who have never been married to each other.  King v. Commissioner,           
          121 T.C. 245, 251 (2003).                                                   
               2In the present case, the exceptions in sec. 152(e)(3) and             
          (4) do not apply.  There was no multiple support agreement as               
          defined in sec. 152(c) and, since the Judgment of Support was               
          entered in 2001, there is no pre-1985 instrument.  Thus,                    
          petitioner is entitled to the dependency exemption only if the              
          requirements of sec. 152(e)(2) are met.                                     








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007