Jack Daniel Chavez, Sr. - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all             
          Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and                  
          Procedure.                                                                  
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner’s Federal             
          income taxes for the years 2002 and 2003 in the amounts of $4,563           
          and $4,237, respectively.  The sole issue for decision is whether           
          petitioner is entitled to an alimony deduction in the amount of             
          $16,937 for each of the taxable years in issue.                             
                                     Background                                       
               The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                 
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petitions were           
          filed, petitioner resided in Lansing, Illinois.                             
               Petitioner and his former spouse, Debra Chavez (Ms. Chavez)            
          were married on September 4, 1971, in Cook County, Illinois.                
          Three children were born of the marriage.  On June 7, 2001, a               
          Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage (Judgment) was entered in the           
          Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Domestic Relations                  
          Division (circuit court).  At the time that the Judgment was                
          entered, one of the three children was a minor.                             
               In paragraph 1.2, Article I, of the Judgment, the circuit              
          court ordered petitioner to make monthly payments described as              
          “unallocated child support.”  Paragraph 1.3, Article I, states              
          that the payments would cease on October 1, 2003, the 19th                  
          birthday of petitioner’s youngest daughter.  The Judgment is                
          silent otherwise as to whether the payments or any part thereof,            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007