Neil Malcolm Cowie and Karen Christine Shunk - Page 7




                                         - 7 -                                        
               Petitioners bear the burden of proving the reasonableness of           
          the costs claimed.  See Rule 232(e); Powers v. Commissioner, 100            
          T.C. 457, 491 (1993), affd., in part, revd. in part and remanded            
          43 F.3d 172 (5th Cir. 1995).  Petitioners proceeded pro se.  A pro          
          se litigant, even though an attorney, is not entitled to an award           
          of attorney’s fees under section 7430.  Frisch v. Commissioner, 87          
          T.C. 838 (1986).  Congress intended section 7430 as a fee shifting          
          statute.  Id. at 840.  However, petitioners “did not pay or incur           
          fees for legal services”.  Id. at 846.                                      
               Additionally, petitioners did not specify an award amount.             
          The motion lists only “at least 15 hours on the telephone”, “at             
          least twenty five hours generating the Petition”, “at least ten             
          hours generating this motion”, and “many additional hours                   
          marshalling and copying paperwork”.  The recitation of time spent           
          does not include dates or descriptions of the work done.                    
          Petitioners argue that Mr. Cowie’s time is worth at least                   
          $125 per hour.3                                                             









               3$125, as increased by a cost-of-living adjustment, is the             
          maximum hourly rate provided in sec. 7430(c)(1)(B)(iii), absent             
          special circumstances.                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007