Curr-Spec Partners, LP, Curr-Spec Managers, LLC, Tax Matters Partner - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          II. Whether Petitioner May Amend Its Petition A Second Time                 
               Rule 34(b)(4) provides that the petition in a deficiency or            
          liability action shall contain “Clear and concise assignments of            
          each and every error which the petitioner alleges to have been              
          committed by the Commissioner * * *.  * * *  Any issue not raised           
          in the assignments of error shall be deemed to be conceded.”                
          Rule 241(d)(1)(C) provides a similar rule for a petition in a               
          partnership action.                                                         
               Petitioner seeks to amend its petition a second time to                
          assign error to the adjustments in the FPAA.  Rule 41(a) provides           
          in part:  “A party may amend a pleading once as a matter of                 
          course at any time before a responsive pleading is served.  * * *           
          Otherwise a party may amend a pleading only by leave of Court or            
          by written consent of the adverse party, and leave shall be given           
          freely when justice so requires.”  Rule 41 is similar to rule               
          15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which also                   
          declares that leave to amend “shall be given freely when justice            
          so requires.”  Kramer v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1081, 1084-1085              
          (1987) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962)).  We have               
          looked to holdings under rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil           
          Procedure for guidance in interpreting Rule 41.  Id.                        




               4(...continued)                                                        
          argument is without merit.                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007