- 9 -
whether he was afforded a conference with Appeals. Accordingly,
because Mr. Poppo had an opportunity to dispute the underlying
tax liability in a conference with the Appeals Office, he may not
raise that underlying liability again in a collection review
hearing or before this Court. See sec. 6330(c)(2)(B); sec.
301.6320-1(e)(3), Q&A-E2, Proced. & Admin. Regs.
Mr. Poppo has not raised in his petition any issues, other
than the underlying liability, with respect to respondent’s
proposed collection action. Therefore, for the reasons stated,
respondent’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
To reflect the foregoing,
An appropriate order and
decision will be entered for
respondent.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: November 10, 2007