Richard Mark Hilton - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          substantiate items properly.  See sec. 6662(c); sec.                        
          1.6662-3(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  A “substantial understatement”            
          includes an understatement of tax that exceeds the greater of 10            
          percent of the tax required to be shown on the return or $5,000.            
          See sec. 6662(d); sec. 1.6662-4(b), Income Tax Regs.  The                   
          Commissioner bears the burden of production.  Sec. 7491(c).                 
               Section 6664(c)(1) provides that the penalty under section             
          6662(a) shall not apply to any portion of an underpayment if it             
          is shown that there was reasonable cause for the taxpayer’s                 
          position and that the taxpayer acted in good faith with respect             
          to that portion.  The determination of whether a taxpayer acted             
          with reasonable cause and in good faith is made on a case-by-case           
          basis, taking into account all the pertinent facts and                      
          circumstances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  The most             
          important factor is the extent of the taxpayer’s effort to assess           
          his proper tax liability for the year.  Id.  Reliance on the                
          advice of a professional tax adviser does not necessarily                   
          demonstrate reasonable cause and good faith.  Id.                           
               For a taxpayer to rely reasonably upon advice so as to                 
          negate a section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty determined by             
          the Commissioner, the taxpayer must prove by a preponderance of             
          the evidence that the taxpayer meets all of the following                   
          requirements:  (1) The adviser was a competent professional who             
          had sufficient expertise to justify reliance, (2) the taxpayer              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007