Stuart Hult - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
               As noted above, on or about October 21, 2003, a Notice                 
          of Federal Tax Lien was filed with respect to petitioner’s                  
          outstanding tax liabilities (the NFTL).  By letter dated                    
          October 27, 2003, petitioner was advised of the event and                   
          notified of his right to request an administrative hearing to               
          dispute it, which he did in a request dated November 27, 2003.              
               A short time earlier, by letter dated November 19, 2003,               
          petitioner was advised that the 2003 offer had been rejected                
          because:  (1) It was “less than * * * [petitioner’s] reasonable             
          collection potential”; and (2) petitioner had “failed to provide            
          the requested information and documentation” about his wife’s               
          income and expenses.  That letter also advised petitioner that he           
          could appeal the rejection of the 2003 offer, which he did by               
          letter dated December 18, 2003.                                             
               Petitioner’s request for an administrative hearing with                
          respect to the NFTL and his appeal of the rejection of the 2003             
          offer were assigned to Settlement Officer Michael Blais (Mr.                
          Blais).  For reasons discussed in a memorandum dated December 15,           
          2004, Mr. Blais upheld the rejection of the 2003 offer.                     
               During the administrative hearing conducted in connection              
          with the NFTL, petitioner offered an installment agreement as an            
          alternative collection action.  Under the terms of the proposed             
          installment agreement, petitioner offered to pay $100 per month             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007