Marc Perkel - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
               Section 6320 entitles a person to notice of his right to               
          request a hearing after a notice of lien is filed by the                    
          Commissioner in furtherance of the collection from the person of            
          unpaid Federal taxes.  If one is requested, the administrative              
          hearing is before the Appeals Office of the Internal Revenue                
          Service.  Sec. 6330(b)(1).  The person requesting the hearing may           
          raise any relevant issue with regard to the Commissioner’s                  
          intended collection activities, including spousal defenses,                 
          challenges to the appropriateness of the Commissioner’s intended            
          collection action, and alternative means of collection.  Secs.              
          6320(b) and (c); 6330(c); see Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604,           
          609 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 180 (2000).                 
               Section 6330(c)(2)(B) provides that the existence or the               
          amount of the underlying tax liability can be contested at an               
          Appeals Office hearing if the person did not receive a notice of            
          deficiency or did not otherwise have an earlier opportunity to              
          dispute such tax liability.  Sego v. Commissioner, supra; Goza v.           
          Commissioner, supra at 180-181.                                             
          Petitioner’s Current Argument                                               
               The disagreement expressed by petitioner at the June 12,               
          2006, hearing, and in his subsequently filed response to                    
          respondent’s motion, appears to concern the applicability of the            
          accuracy-related penalty.  Because petitioner self-assessed his             
          tax for the year at issue, no statutory notice of deficiency was            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011