Barbara A. Trimble-Gee - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
                                     Discussion                                       
               In general, the Commissioner’s determinations set forth in a           
          notice of deficiency are presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears           
          the burden of showing that the determinations are in error.  Rule           
          142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  Deductions           
          and credits are a matter of legislative grace, and the taxpayer             
          bears the burden of proving entitlement to any deduction or                 
          credit claimed on his return.  See INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner,           
          503 U.S. 79 (1992).                                                         
               Pursuant to section 7491(a), the burden of proof as to                 
          factual matters shifts to the Commissioner under certain                    
          circumstances.  Petitioner has neither alleged that section                 
          7491(a) applies nor established her compliance with the                     
          requirements of section 7491(a)(2)(A) and (B) to substantiate               
          items, maintain records, and cooperate fully with respondent’s              
          reasonable requests.  Petitioner therefore bears the burden of              
          proof.                                                                      
          I.   Schedule C Deductions                                                  
               A taxpayer who carries on a trade or business generally may            
          deduct ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in                  
          connection with the operation of the business.  Sec. 162(a); see            
          also FMR Corp. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 402, 414 (1998).           
          Respondent does not dispute that the cleaning business qualifies            
          as a trade or business for Federal income tax purposes.  Thus, we           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007