Salvatore A. D'Onofrio - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
                                     Background                                       
               This is an appeal from respondent’s determination to proceed           
          with the collection of petitioner’s 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and             
          1999 Federal income tax liabilities.2  Petitioner resided in                
          Redondo Beach, California, when his petition was filed.                     
               Petitioner failed to file Federal income tax returns for               
          1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993.  Respondent prepared substitutes for            
          returns under section 6020(b) for 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993.               
          Respondent subsequently determined a deficiency in petitioner’s             
          tax liability for each of these years.                                      
               On April 14, 1995, respondent mailed to petitioner a notice            
          of deficiency for 1990 and 1991.  Respondent sent the notice to             
          the following address:  S. A. D’ONOFRIO, ORANGE COUNTY, C/O 676             
          CATALINA, AKA LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA.  Petitioner refused to              
          accept delivery of the notice, and on April 20, 1995, respondent            
          received the returned notice of deficiency with the words                   
          “Refused for Cause UCC 3-501” handwritten on the envelope.  On              
          April 20 and September 13, 1995, respondent received letters from           
          petitioner marked “REFUSAL FOR CAUSE UCC 3-501 Without Dishonor”            
          in which petitioner raised various frivolous arguments regarding            


               2Respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment pertains             
          only to tax years 1990 through 1993.  Respondent concedes that              
          petitioner did not have a prior opportunity to contest his                  
          underlying tax liability for 1999.  Accordingly, respondent                 
          concurrently filed a motion for continuance so that he could have           
          an opportunity to resolve petitioner’s 1999 liability.  On Feb.             
          5, 2007, we granted respondent’s motion for continuance.                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008