Edward H. Jones, III - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
               On September 3, 2001, the IRS assessed a $3,160.07 “Failure            
          to Pay Tax Penalty” (see supra note 3) and $3,307.90 of interest.           
          On September 10, 2001, the IRS credited petitioner’s account with           
          $300 “Immediate Tax Relief Credit” and assessed an additional               
          $178.48 of interest.  On each of these dates the IRS sent a                 
          statutory notice of balance due to petitioner.                              
               Petitioner’s case was assigned to Revenue Officer Karen                
          Krogue (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Krogue) on September           
          28, 2001.6  On October 24, 2001, Krogue sent a letter to                    
          petitioner stating the balance due on petitioner’s account.                 
          Krogue and petitioner each attempted to contact the other by                
          telephone on November 8, 2001 (and perhaps other times), and                
          finally met in Krogue’s office, in Bellevue, Washington, on                 
          November 14, 2001.  At this meeting, Krogue and petitioner                  
          discussed payment of the balance of petitioner’s 2000 tax                   
          obligation.  Krogue told petitioner that respondent’s policy was            
          to collect payment in full if the taxpayer had enough assets to             
          satisfy the tax obligation, but that installment arrangements               
          were possible under certain circumstances.  Krogue told                     
          petitioner that by December 14, 2001, he was to submit:  A Form             
          433-A, Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and                


               6 So stated in Revenue Officer Krogue’s stipulated case                
          notes.  Petitioner’s response and memorandum state that his case            
          was assigned to Krogue on or about Sept. 24, 2001.  This                    
          difference does not affect our conclusions.                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008