|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Sinkfield v. Kelley, 531 U.S. 28, 4 (2000) (per curiam)Legal Research Home > United States Supreme Court > 531 U.S. > Sinkfield v. Kelley, 531 U.S. 28, 4 (2000) (per curiam) Cite as: 531 U. S. 28 (2000) Per Curiam districts. We rejected that argument in Hays, explaining that evidence sufficient to support a Shaw claim with respect to a majority-minority district did "not prove anything" with respect to a neighboring majority-white district in which the appellees resided. 515 U. S., at 746. Accordingly, "an allegation to that effect does not allege a cognizable injury under the Fourteenth Amendment." Ibid. The judgment of the District Court is vacated, and the cases are remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint. It is so ordered. 31 Page: Index Previous 1 2 3 4Last modified: October 4, 2007 |