THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN C. THEOBALD
____________
Appeal No. 95-0907
Application 07/774,7571
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and LEE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over prior art. No claim has been allowed.
References in the Stated Ground of Rejection
Rattan et al. U.S. Patent No. 4,698,770 Oct. 6, 1987
(Rattan)
Wang et al. (Wang)
"Protocol Testing Techniques," Computer Communication, Vol. 10,
Application for patent filed October 8, 1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007