Ex parte ROSENBERGER et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 95-1092                                                          
          Application 08/044,436                                                      


          composition.  The examiner’s position is that “it would have                
          been obvious to one of ordinary skill to adjust the viscosity               
          by adding a mixture of coating and solvent because it is                    
          desirable to minimize the amount of solvent used in spraying                
          processes” (answer, page 4).  The examiner has not pointed to               
          any teaching in the references of record or provided any                    
          objective evidence to support this conclusion.  Accordingly,                
          we will reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-9 for                  
          obviousness.                                                                
                                    Conclusion                                        
               For the aforementioned reasons, the examiner’s rejection               
          of claims 1-6 for obviousness is affirmed and the rejection of              
          claims 7-9 is reversed.                                                     














                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007