Ex parte SITES et al. - Page 8




              Appeal No. 95-1351                                                                                                                       
              Application 07/547,630                                                                                                                   

                       For the reasons stated above, the rejection of independent claims 1 and 8 is reversed.  Since                                   
              dependent claims 2-4, 6, 9-11, 13, and 15-20 incorporate the limitation of claims 1 and 8, the                                           
              rejection of these claims is also reversed.                                                                                              
                                                                REVERSED                                                                               









                       GARY V. HARKCOM                                               )                                                                 
                       Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge               )                                                                          
                                                                                              )                                                        
                                                                                              )                                                        
                                                                                              )                                                        
                                                                                              )  BOARD OF PATENT                                       
                       JERRY SMITH                                          )     APPEALS                                                              
                       Administrative Patent Judge                          )       AND                                                                
                                                                                              )   INTERFERENCES                                        
                                                                                              )                                                        
                                                                                              )                                                        
                                                                                              )                                                        
                       LEE E. BARRETT                                                         )                                                        
                       Administrative Patent Judge                          )                                                                          









                                                                     - 8 -                                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007