Ex parte OGAWA et al. - Page 1





                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                          
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                        
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      
                                                               Paper No. 24               
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                    _______________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                              
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                    _______________                                       
                                Ex parte KAZUFUMI OGAWA                                   
                                   and TADASHI OHTAKE                                     
                                     ______________                                       
                                   Appeal No. 95-1628                                     
                                Application 08/067,7501                                   
                                    _______________                                       
                                HEARD: OCTOBER 15, 1997                                   
                                    _______________                                       
          Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            
                                   Decision on Appeal                                     
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision                  
          of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 7.  Claims                   
          8 through 16 are also of record and have been withdrawn from                    
          consideration by the examiner as directed to a nonelected                       
          invention.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal:                    
               1.  A foamed plastic containing cells, comprising a                        
          foaming monomer having a conjugate unsaturated carbon group in                  
          the cells, wherein the foaming monomer is reacted to form an                    
          oligomer having more than a dimer, or to form a polymer.                        


                                                                                         
          1  Application for patent filed May 26, 1993.                                   

                                       - 1 -                                              



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007