Appeal No. 95-2742
Application 08/006,411
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KIRK A. CRONIN, ROBERT D. CROW
and WILLIAM A. EVANKO
______________
Appeal No. 95-2742
Application 08/006,4111
_______________
On BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the decision of
the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 11. Claims 1 and
9 are illustrative of the claims on appeal:2
1Application for patent filed January 21, 1993.
2Appellants state in their brief (page 3) that “[n]o grouping
of the claims is necessary” and argues the claims as grouped in
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007