THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL R. POTTER and BRUCE J. KILGORE
____________
Appeal No. 95-3510
Application No. 08/032,4051
____________
HEARD: August 5, 1997
____________
Before MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
LYDDANE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 29, 31 through 45 and 47 through
51, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed March 12, 1993. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/879,725, filed May 6, 1992, which was a continuation of
Application No. 07/702,129, filed May 16, 1991, which was a
continuation of Application No. 07/480,586, filed February 15,
1990, which was a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/324,705, filed March 17, 1989, and a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/416,262, filed October 3, 1989.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007