Ex parte POTTER et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 95-3510                                                          
          Application No. 08/032,405                                                  


          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nishimura in view of             
          Gilbert and Thedford as applied to claims 8, 36 and 42 above, and           
          further in view of Keen.                                                    


               Claims 12, 13 and 18 through 27 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nishimura in view of             
          Gilbert and Thedford as applied to claim 1 above, and further in            
          view of Bullard III.                                                        


               Claims 14 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Nishimura in view of Gilbert, Thedford              
          and Bullard III as applied to claim 12 above, and further in view           
          of Pagani.                                                                  


               Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Nishimura in view of Gilbert, Thedford              
          and Bullard III as applied to claim 12 above, and further in view           
          of McCoy and Broecker.                                                      


               Claim 28 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Nishimura in view of Gilbert and Thedford as              
          applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Huang.                     

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007