Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte JOHN D. JENSEN - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > Ex parte JOHN D. JENSEN - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 23                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                   Ex parte JOHN D. JENSEN                                                                    
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 95-4113                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/124,3341                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                   HEARD: December 9, 1997                                                                    
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and                                                                         
                McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                               

                NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            



                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                               
                rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 21, 22, 23 and 26                                                                   
                through 29.  Claims 17, 19, 20, 30, 31 and 32 have been allowed.                                                              
                Claims 3, 12 and 25 have been objected to as depending from a non                                                             
                allowed claim.  Claims 2, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18 and 24 have                                                               
                been canceled.                                                                                                                




                         1Application for patent filed September 20, 1993.                                                                    




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007