THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOSEPH J. HEIJNEN, WILHELMUS A. A. KOEVOETS
and ROBERT J. ZOETEMEYER
________________
Appeal No. 96-0889
Application 08/089,9441
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 5
and 8, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed July 9, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a division of Application
07/581,135, filed September 10, 1990, now U.S. Patent No.
5,230,794, issued July 27, 1993; which is a continuation of
Application 07/254,053, filed October 6, 1988, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007