THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SADAYUKI KATO, HIROAKI ISHIHATA,
TAKESHI HORIE, SATOSHI INANO,
and TOSHIYUKI SHIMIZU
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0950
Application 07/727,9321
______________
HEARD: APRIL 8, 1997
_______________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-7 and
9-14, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application.
We reverse.
1Application for patent filed July 10, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007