THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SVEIN NORDTVEDT
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1058
Application 08/211,1431
______________
HEARD: September 18, 1997
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and LYDDANE and
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Svein Nordtvedt, appellant, appeals from the final rejection
of claims 8 through 10 and 12 through 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Claims 11 and 18 have been indicated as allowable subject to
being rewritten in independent form. We reverse.
1Application for patent filed March 22, 1994
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007