Ex parte MICHAEL E. ORLOWSKI - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          

                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                           
                       today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                             
                       journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                         
                                                                                                    Paper No. 8                       
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                                 
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                         ____________                                                                 
                                            Ex parte MICHAEL E. ORLOWSKI                                                              
                                                         ____________                                                                 
                                                    Appeal No. 96-1823                                                                
                                              Application No. 08/187,5211                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                                 
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                  
                                                         ____________                                                                 
               Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge, McCANDLISH, Senior                                                        
               Administrative Patent Judge and NASE, Administrative Patent                                                            
               Judge.                                                                                                                 
               NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                     



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                       This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                         
               rejection of claims 1 through 6, which are all of the claims                                                           
               pending in this application.                                                                                           


                       We REVERSE.                                                                                                    

                       1Application for patent filed January 28, 1994.                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007