THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YOSHIFUMI IWATA and KIYOSHI KUCHIKI
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1899
Application 07/936,0071
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-4, 8,
9, and 11. Claim 10 is objected to as being dependant on a
rejected base claim, but otherwise allowable. The other claims
remaining in the application, Claims 5-7 and 12-17, were
indicated as allowable in the Examiner’s Answer.
We reverse.
1Application for patent filed August 27, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007