Ex parte PAPPALARDO - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > Ex parte PAPPALARDO - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte ROMANO G. PAPPALARDO
Appeal No. 96-2138
Application 07/967,6071
ON BRIEF
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the
application. We reverse.
Application for patent filed October 28, 1992, entitled1
"Fluorescent Lamp With Improved CRI And Brightness."
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
