Ex parte PAPPALARDO - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > Ex parte PAPPALARDO - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
Ex parte ROMANO G. PAPPALARDO
Appeal No. 96-2138
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the
application. We reverse.
Application for patent filed October 28, 1992, entitled1
"Fluorescent Lamp With Improved CRI And Brightness."
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: November 3, 2007