Appeal No. 96-2138
Application 07/967,607
For the reasons stated above, we reverse the rejection of
claim 1. Because dependent claims 2-20 depend directly or
indirectly from claim 1 and incorporate all of the limitations
thereof, the rejections of claims 2-20 are also reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 9 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007