THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DEWEY T. HOLLAND
________________
Appeal No. 96-3833
Application 08/014,3201
________________
HEARD: June 11, 1997
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and COHEN
AND LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 32 through 37 and 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
All of the other claims in the application have either been
canceled or have been withdrawn from consideration as being
directed to a non-elected invention.
1Application for patent filed February 5, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007