THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte THOMAS R. NEUENSCHWANDER
________________
Appeal No. 96-4104
Application 08/262,2311
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8 to
12 and 24 to 27, all the claims remaining in the application.
Claim 8 is illustrative of the subject matter in issue:
Application for patent filed June 20, 1994. According1
to appellant, this application is a division of Application
07/903,372, June 24, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,349,741,
issued September 27, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007