Appeal No. 96-4104
Application 08/262,231
to be effective by relatively rotating adjacent laminas, but
rather by alternately stacking two different laminas, the
spacing means on one being positioned differently from the
spacing means on the other.
Absent any disclosure of relative rotation of adjacent
laminas by Diederichs, there would be no suggestion to one of
ordinary skill to provide Neuenschwander with a means for
relatively rotating adjacent laminas to offset their spacing
means.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision to reject claims 8
to 12 and 24 to 27 is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Baker & Daniels
111 East Wayne St.
Suite 800
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007