Ex parte WANG - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 93-3228                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 07/796,023                                                                                                                                            


                     bioactive polypeptide with lipid powder.  The lipid powder may                                                                                                    
                     be, inter alia, solid lipids, cholic acid, or preferably                                                                                                          
                     cholesterol (specification, page 8, lines 2-19).  The                                                                                                             
                     bioactive polypeptide may be insulin or somatotropin  (id.,                                                     2                                                 
                     page 1, lines 10-14, and page 3, lines 2-3).                                                                                                                      


                                A major point of contention between appellant and the                                                                                                  
                     examiner is the meaning or scope of the claimed term                                                                                                              
                     “consisting essentially of” (brief, pages 3-5, and the answer,                                                                                                    
                     pages 3 and 9-11).  The meaning of the phrase “consisting                                                                                                         
                     essentially of” is well settled.  The CCPA in In re                                                                                                               
                     Janakirama-Rao  defines “consisting essentially of” as3                                                                                                                                   
                     follows:                                                                                                                                                          

                                           The word “essentially” opens the claims to                                                                                                  
                                           the inclusion of ingredients which would                                                                                                    
                                           not materially affect the basic and novel                                                                                                   
                                           characteristics of appellant’s compositions                                                                                                 
                                           as defined in the balance of the claim...                                                                                                   
                                           (emphasis in original).                                                                                                                     

                                2    The examiner has used the word “somatotropin” and the term “growth hormone”                                                                       
                     interchangeably (answer, page 3, line 3).  Appellant has not contested this usage.                                                                                
                                3    317 F.2d 951, 954, 137 USPQ 893, 896 (CCPA 1963).  See also In re DeLajarte,                                                                      
                     337 F.2d 870, 873-74, 143 USPQ 256, 258 (CCPA 1964), discussed on pages 3-4 of the                                                                                
                     brief, and Ex parte Davis, 80 USPQ 448, 450 (Bd. App. 1948).                                                                                                      
                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007