Ex parte WANG - Page 9




                     Appeal No. 93-3228                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 07/796,023                                                                                                                                            


                     ingredients even in major amounts.   Therefore, upon                     6                                                                                        
                     amendment, the examiner and appellant should reconcile the                                                                                                        
                     scope of the claims.                                                                                                                                              
                                This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant                                                                                              
                     to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final                                                                                                     
                     rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203                                                                                                    
                     Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63,122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37                                                                                                    
                     CFR                                                                                                                                                               
                     § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not                                                                                                    
                     be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                                                                                                             
                                37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                                                                                                    
                     WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise                                                                                                    
                     one of the following two options with respect to the new                                                                                                          
                     ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings                                                                                                           
                     (§ 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                                                                                                           

                                                     (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of                                                                                            
                                           the claims so rejected or a showing of                                                                                                      
                                           facts relating to the claims so rejected,                                                                                                   
                                           or both, and have the matter reconsidered                                                                                                   
                                           by the                                                                                                                                      
                                           examiner, in which event the application                                                                                                    

                                6    See Ex parte Davis, 80 USPQ 448, 450 (Bd. App. 1948). See also In re Baxter,                                                                      
                     656 F.2d 679, 686-87, 210 USPQ 795, 802-03 (CCPA 1981).                                                                                                           
                                                                                          9                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007